

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
  <title>BSC Online Community</title> 
  <description></description> 
  <link>https://www.bscol.com/community/forum//index.cfm?forumid=4</link> 
  <generator>FuseTalk Standard Edition</generator> 

	
	<item>
		<title>Lin manufacturing</title>
		<link>https://www.bscol.com/community/forum//messageview.cfm?catid=31&amp;threadid=353</link> 
		<pubDate>2009-09-16T16:04:00 -05.00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>Francisco Ayala</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ I'm a consultant in BSC in Mexico:   Which could be the main aspects to help lin manufacturing to be succesfully implemented using BSC? ]]></description>
	</item>

	
	<item>
		<title>Business Important</title>
		<link>https://www.bscol.com/community/forum//messageview.cfm?catid=31&amp;threadid=331</link> 
		<pubDate>2009-01-30T12:54:42 -05.00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>sanju86 kumar</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>2</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Every business wanted that his business growth is increase day by day.Business man wanted to his business growth is high to comparing business.Business man every time search new things of related of his business and find out the errors of the business.Every business requirement is different-different. Its depends on business environment. But some business requirement is same in all type of business.<br />Our requirements templates help you quickly and easily specify business requirements for many types of RFPs. These comprehensive requirements lists will save you hours of work while ensuring that your RFP (Request for Proposals) addresses all of your key business needs. You can easily customize each requirements list for your particular needs.<br />-----------------------<br />sanju<br /> 	  <a target=_blank class=ftalternatingbarlinklarge href="http://jobs.bizoppjunction.com">Job Search</a>Job Search ]]></description>
	</item>

	
	<item>
		<title>Different Perspectives</title>
		<link>https://www.bscol.com/community/forum//messageview.cfm?catid=31&amp;threadid=329</link> 
		<pubDate>2008-11-15T04:24:36 -05.00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>Mohammad Wahadneh</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Dear All;<br />I have implemented many BSC systems in my career, and i reached to that to be able to cascade the BSC, you have to previously think of what perspectives to use, and the result was great if you free your mind from the regular 4 perspectives according to the nature of business.<br /><br />anyone has an idea in this? ]]></description>
	</item>

	
	<item>
		<title>why do scorecards seem to exist in a vacuum - I want to align existing business plans to a new scorecard...</title>
		<link>https://www.bscol.com/community/forum//messageview.cfm?catid=31&amp;threadid=266</link> 
		<pubDate>2007-07-12T07:30:40 -05.00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>Jane Wilkin</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>7</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ I have just joined a small not for profit organisation (devoted to improving leadership in the Scottish Public Sector) as their performance improvement manager. We have a consultant who is building our scorecard and my role is to take over the scorecard implementation, business improvement and business planning.<br /><br />Whilst I can find a lot of information on the building of scorecards and reporting on measures, there seems to be very little on linking this to business planning to deliver an integrated process. Specifically I have mapped our current business plan against the measures developed in conjunction with the consultant, and now want to align and focus current activity with the scorecard, and cascade measure ownership/reporting through the pdr process.<br /><br />Does anyone have any experiance of this or advise on where to go for information? ]]></description>
	</item>

	
	<item>
		<title>Cascading Objectives Guidelines</title>
		<link>https://www.bscol.com/community/forum//messageview.cfm?catid=31&amp;threadid=255</link> 
		<pubDate>2007-05-31T10:53:45 -05.00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>Amira Hammad</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Hi All,<br />I am currently cascading our corporate scorecard to the divisions and i want to reach the personal scorecards level. The problem is that not all employees know how to set objectives and consequently they need high supervision to develop their scorecards.<br />At the same time, i have two months only to develop 400 personal scorecards.<br /><br />Does anyone have guidelines on how to cascade objectives? These guidleines can be very useful for me.<br /><br />Thank you<br /><br />Amira Hammad<br />Giza Systems ]]></description>
	</item>

	
	<item>
		<title>Cascading to  SBU Levels</title>
		<link>https://www.bscol.com/community/forum//messageview.cfm?catid=31&amp;threadid=253</link> 
		<pubDate>2007-05-28T03:11:16 -05.00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>MANOJ ONKAR</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>3</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Hi,<br /><br />We have a corporate strategy map and we have started working on the objectives.<br /><br />We have 3 different business verticals - SBUs.<br /><br />My question is - Is it necessary to have a strategy map for each SBU or is it ok<br />to create a Scorecard for the SBUs based onthe Corporate Scorecard and not do<br />the whole exercise of creating the map.<br /><br /><br />Await some guidance. ]]></description>
	</item>

	
	<item>
		<title>Cascading to  SBU Levels</title>
		<link>https://www.bscol.com/community/forum//messageview.cfm?catid=31&amp;threadid=252</link> 
		<pubDate>2007-05-28T03:10:26 -05.00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>MANOJ ONKAR</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Hi,<br /><br />We have a corporate strategy map and we have started working on the objectives.<br /><br />We have 3 different business verticals - SBUs.<br /><br />My question is - Is it necessary to have a strategy map for each SBU or is it ok<br />to create a Scorecard for the SBUs based onthe Corporate Scorecard and not do<br />the whole exercise of creating the map.<br /><br /><br />Await some guidance. ]]></description>
	</item>

	
	<item>
		<title>Cascading to  SBU Levels</title>
		<link>https://www.bscol.com/community/forum//messageview.cfm?catid=31&amp;threadid=251</link> 
		<pubDate>2007-05-28T03:09:34 -05.00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>MANOJ ONKAR</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>4</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ Hi,<br /><br />We have a corporate strategy map and we have started working on the objectives.<br /><br />We have 3 different business verticals - SBUs.<br /><br />My question is - Is it necessary to have a strategy map for each SBU or is it ok<br />to create a Scorecard for the SBUs based onthe Corporate Scorecard and not do<br />the whole exercise of creating the map.<br /><br /><br />Await some guidance. ]]></description>
	</item>

	
	<item>
		<title>Matrix to evaluate alignment</title>
		<link>https://www.bscol.com/community/forum//messageview.cfm?catid=31&amp;threadid=250</link> 
		<pubDate>2007-05-27T12:48:04 -05.00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>patrick jaulent</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>55</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ <div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote><i>Originally posted by: <b>patrick jaulent</b></i><br /><br />Hello,<br /> <br />Balanced Scorecard is an excellent Tool for Translating Strategy to Execution. To carry out the strategy the organization should be aligned<br /><br />To align the organization and the strategy we use a matrix.  I defined this type of matrix in my thesis in 1988. I did not think of using it then. <br /><br />This matrix makes it possible to <b>evaluate the level of alignment</b>. Alignment between: <br /><br />-&gt; Actions of progress - Initiatives - Objectives (financial & Customer) ;<br /><br />-&gt; Incentives - Objective of employees - Objectives (drivers and/or impact) ;<br /><br />-&gt; Drivers Objectives (Internal processes & L&G) - Business processes - Impact Objectives (Finance & Customer)<br /><br />-&gt; Investments - Objectives<br /><br />-&gt; ....<br /><br />The how do we know we are selecting the right initiatives to drive our strategy ? Do we even have visibility into all the initiatives ? Are we getting the necessary benefits from the initiatives ?<br /><br />I send document to moderator<br /><br />I look forward to more discussion on this topic within this forum.<br /><br /><b>---&gt;&gt; To obtain information on the matrix you can contact me on my E email </b><br /><br /><br />Regards<br /><br />Patrick Jaulent, France<br />Senior Manager, Accenture, France<br />President BSC club, France ]]></description>
	</item>

	
	<item>
		<title>functional scorecard weightages</title>
		<link>https://www.bscol.com/community/forum//messageview.cfm?catid=31&amp;threadid=245</link> 
		<pubDate>2007-05-15T02:36:14 -05.00</pubDate> 
		<dc:creator>puneet bharel</dc:creator>
   	    <slash:comments>5</slash:comments> 
		<description><![CDATA[ hi, we have balance scorecard in our organization and needed some help on teh following while cascading it to the respective functions.<br /><br />Situation is as follows:<br />At a corporate company level, we have the following weightages:<br />Financial-40%, Customer-20%, Internal processes-20% and L&G-20%<br /><br />Now, for the different functions, do we maintain the same proportion (so that the functions converge to the overall corporate goal), or do we change the proportion as per the key competencies of respective function.<br /><br />For example, in the case of Manufacturing, we can have 2 options:<br /><br />Option 1 (illustrative):<br /><br />Financial-40%, Customer-20%, Internal processes-20% and L&G-20%<br /><br />Or do we have Option 2 (illustrative):<br /><br />Financial-30%, Customer-20%, Internal processes-20% and L&G-30%<br /><br />Option 1 will make Manufacturing focus more on financial aspects like profitability; whereas Option 2 will make Manufacturing focus on Learning as well (for eg: employee development- that is important for long term sustained progress)...<br /><br />Looking forward to the responses...thanks ]]></description>
	</item>

</channel>
</rss>


